- I'm under no confusion about what they're insinuating, that's not the point (see that below)
- I'm looking for their reply specifically
It's relatively easy to accuse, and to make up some story. It's a lot harder to provide substance and formulate a compelling argument.
Is the number of medical facilities really outstanding? Why does that suggest they're combatant hideouts? Which of them are, all? Why does them hiding combatants render double, triple, quadruple tapping, or even just targeting these facilities morally justified or reasonable? What sense does it even make to double, triple, quadruple tap in this context?
All pretty important questions I'd say, none of which are addressed by cowardly insinuations, I believe by design.
Last time I checked, my internal moral compass rated actually killing healthcare workers and the sick/injured/etc a lot worse than combatants using them as potential collateral (not that that'd be the pinnacle of morality). One would assume most other people's compass does too, hence why the above is news. How the paramedics that arrive afterwards become deserving of getting shelled, further remains an unelaborated-on mystery.
Yea, you mean Israel's use of human shields, right?....wait, who are we talking about using human shields, again?
"Dressed in army fatigues with a camera fixed to his forehead, Ayman Abu Hamadan was forced into houses in the Gaza Strip to make sure they were clear of bombs and gunmen, he said. When one unit finished with him, he was passed to the next.
“They beat me and told me: ‘You have no other option; do this or we’ll kill you,’” the 36-year-old told The Associated Press, describing the 2 1/2 weeks he was held last summer by the Israeli military in northern Gaza."
- I'm under no confusion about what they're insinuating, that's not the point (see that below)
- I'm looking for their reply specifically
It's relatively easy to accuse, and to make up some story. It's a lot harder to provide substance and formulate a compelling argument.
Is the number of medical facilities really outstanding? Why does that suggest they're combatant hideouts? Which of them are, all? Why does them hiding combatants render double, triple, quadruple tapping, or even just targeting these facilities morally justified or reasonable? What sense does it even make to double, triple, quadruple tap in this context?
All pretty important questions I'd say, none of which are addressed by cowardly insinuations, I believe by design.
Last time I checked, my internal moral compass rated actually killing healthcare workers and the sick/injured/etc a lot worse than combatants using them as potential collateral (not that that'd be the pinnacle of morality). One would assume most other people's compass does too, hence why the above is news. How the paramedics that arrive afterwards become deserving of getting shelled, further remains an unelaborated-on mystery.